Figure 2. Click on image for larger view.Other benefits were realized as testing continued. Not only did the system generate 80% more air volume, Figure 2, but the return of pressurized air to the inlet of the compressor cut energy consumption by more than 40%. The reduced energy consumption contributed to a short return on investment, Figures 3 and 4. In addition, the closed-loop air was cooler and up to 70% dryer because the compressor no longer needed to pull in ambient air and cool it. This extended the life of tools, hoses, and the compressor.
Finally, the air tools no longer emitted oil vapor and other harmful exhaust into the atmosphere. Because the tool exhaust was returning through a hose to the compressor, dust and debris was no longer blown about from the exhaust of the tools.
Retrofit Kits for All
Bosua realized he needed to develop retrofit kits for common air tools and air compressors.
According to Cliff Kniesly, of Michigan Pneumatic Tool, “The system is designed to allow the retrofit of existing equipment, whether that be existing air compressors, actuators, multiple tools, or entire machines.”
Kniesly added that the practicality of the system depends on the condition of existing equipment and if the facility has excessive compressor capacity. “As plants lean down, they may still be using a 200-hp compressor, even though EARS may be fully supported by a machine half that size or less. Because more than 80% of compressed air over five years is for energy, often a smaller, more efficient compressor has a faster return on investment.” Figure 5 highlights the total real costs of compressed air for industrial use.
Full Constant Power at Low Energy Consumption