“At its core, [DDP] is a very efficient, multi-outlet, digitally controlled pump with fast control response,” explained Arnott. “This enables us to independently control the flow rate to each of the four hydraulic motors driving our propellers. The DDP transmission provides control bandwidth necessary for our multicopter, in which fast and precise control of each propeller is essential for stable flight.”
We had a few more questions for the engineers: Was battery-electric power considered? What are the advantages of using DDP? What is the multicopter’s range?
Their responses, which follow below, have been condensed and edited for clarity.
What advantage does DDP have over conventional hydraulics and pure electric transmission?
Whilst much of the recent multicopter development has been focused on battery-electric power, hydraulics are not new to the aviation industry. Every day, seven million people fly on aeroplanes, which use hydraulic technology for control surfaces, landing gear, brakes, flaps and more. Hydraulics are chosen for their high power density/specific power and reliability. For example, Eaton’s hydraulic engine-driven pumps are used in Airbus A330, A340 and A380 platforms with an average reliability exceeding 50,000 hours MTBF.
The DDP provides a highly efficient method of power transmission to our hydraulic motors. Our Hydro Leduc motors have an extremely high specific power output. Each one is capable of producing 96kW continuous output power whilst weighing only 5.5kg. Hydraulic motors are also inherently robust and capable of withstanding tough environmental use cases—they are most often found powering outdoor all-weather industrial equipment such as excavators and salt-spray spreaders.
By taking hydraulically powered heavy-lift multicopters to the sky, Flowcopter can target applications that have traditionally required helicopters whilst reducing O&M cost and improving personnel safety through autonomous, unmanned flight.
How were you able to improve the range to six hours?
We are able to have long-range flight by making use of a liquid fueled type-certified aircraft engine. This allows us to run on liquid fuel with significantly greater energy density/specific energy than batteries. Our goal is to run on net zero carbon synthetic fuel. This involves extracting hydrogen from water by using energy generated from renewable sources, before combining it with carbon dioxide captured from the atmosphere.
Please explain why the choice was made to go with the IC engine/liquid fuel combination for this drone. Why would battery power alone not work?
Battery-electric propulsion is an amazing method of reducing CO2 emissions, providing the batteries are charged from renewable energy sources. However, batteries have significant drawbacks that become apparent once you try to use them as an energy source to fly. One of these is low specific energy. This means they are heavy. The combination of an IC engine and liquid fuel can deliver 15 times the energy amount to the rotors per pound (kilogram) than batteries. The second limitation to batteries is the degradation of their performance under aggressive discharge cycles, which would be required to fly a heavy industrial drone. This results in the regular requirement to replace such packs.
We feel a net zero emission synthetic fuel offers a significantly better strategy than regularly replacing degraded battery packs.