Are you familiar with MDG41

Aug. 12, 2008
The formulation of the Mining Design Guideline number 41 (MDG 41) came from an industry group set up by the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries in Australia and included global suppliers such as DBT, Joy, and suppliers of fluid ...

The formulation of the Mining Design Guideline number 41 (MDG 41) came from an industry group set up by the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries in Australia and included global suppliers such as DBT, Joy, and suppliers of fluid power components. A key driver in the development of the committee and document was in response to an increasing number of incidents involving high-pressure fluid injection injuries at mining sites.

Companies that produce mining machinery in the US for the global market are now referring to MDG 41 as the latest and most up to date specification. MDG 41 covers the whole process from inception, design, product used, training, installation, etc., giving it recognition as the complete process in one place. But MDG 41 should not be viewed as a mining only specification. MDG 41 is useful for all fluid power applications and should be the benchmark across all industries where hydraulic hose and fittings product are used.

Specific problems addressed
The attachment of a fitting to the end of a hose is a complex engineering solution. International hose standards specify a set of materials and tolerances, such as internal and external dimensions, along with reinforcement types and dimensions. Although these standards are adhered to by all manufacturers, the tolerances themselves are so broad that if the entire tolerance allowance was used in manufacturing, hose assemblies would suffer a high failure rate due to tolerance mismatching. Therefore, manufacturers adopt their own limits that are often less than half of the allowed range.

This is where mixing and matching becomes an issue. Component manufacturer A could produce parts on the lower limits of the tolerance, whereas manufacturer B’s components fall at the upper limit of the tolerance. If an end fitting from B was put onto a hose from A at the specified crimp diameter of B, there would be little chance of adequate end fitting retention. Similarly, if a fitting from A was assembled onto a hose from B, the inner tube of the hose would likely be over compressed or the hose reinforcement could be cut. In either case, premature failure would result.

MDG 41 stipulates hose assemblies shall only be carried out using “Matched Hose and Fittings” (MDG 41 Clause 3.7.6.1k). MDG 41 Clause 1.6.13 defines a matched system as, “where the hose and fittings (insert/ferrule) are from the same manufacturer and are assembled and crimped using the method as specified by that manufacturer.”

This discussion was provided by Ryco Hydraulics Inc., Houston. For more information, visit www.ryco.com or call (281) 821-4100.

Continue Reading

May 10, 2017
Author Brendan Casey lays out his hydraulics know-how that he acquired over 27 years in a simple handbook made for people that want to improve their skills in troubleshooting ...
May 15, 2023
Electrification presents challenges as well as opportunities to re-evaluate and improve upon the design of hydraulics and pneumatics.

Sponsored Recommendations

May 15, 2024
Production equipment is expensive and needs to be protected against input abnormalities such as voltage, current, frequency, and phase to stay online and in operation for the ...
March 13, 2024
With experienced Product Engineers and Customer Service personnel, Altech provides solutions to your most pressing application challenges. All with one thought in mind - to ensure...
March 13, 2024
Introducing the All-In-One DC-UPS, a versatile solution combining multiple functionalities in a single device. Serving as a power supply, battery charger, battery care module,...
March 13, 2024
With experienced Product Engineers and Customer Service personnel, Altech provides solutions to your most pressing application challenges. All with one thought in mind - to ensure...