Figure 1 — ISO format displays all four land KVL values on one set of axes and illustrates how increasing and decreasing the leakage affects the apparent overlap of the valve.
To carry out the leakage study, a simulation program was run five times, and each time a new value for the leakage parameter was used. The values were set, run-to- run, to 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 in.3/sec, respectively. The value for the input overlap was left at 0.85, which was the value that produced critical lap flow metering when the input leakage parameter was set to 2.75 in.3/sec.
KVL metering parameters
Figure 1 is indeed a busy one, what with four different valve lands and five different leakage parameters, all on one set of axes. Each land is labeled, and the minimum and maximum leakage parameters are indicated. It should not be surprising that increasing the input leakage parameter increases KVL value. Also, as the leakage increases, the transition region has a more rounded feature, while the lower leakages have sharper corners. This should not be surprising either.
Imagine that when the clearance is decreased (a lower value for the leakage parameter), the physical distance between the spool metering edge and sleeve’s metering slot will have to diminish at the transition point. This means that the transition from closed to open will be more abrupt, resulting in the sharper corner on the KVL curve.